“Within Scope” Is Not Enough for Tall Women

“Within Scope” Is Not Good Enough, and why I stopped production at the 11th hour.

This one hurts. Because this wasn’t a random style.This was Maria.

We were sampling a third fabric to re-release Maria Athleisure - the pant that stole the hearts (and wardrobes) of 140 women in 2024. 'Maria' is an incredible fitting pant that masquerades as trackies that tall women can wear to work.

Just last week, a Fiona emailed asking when they’d be available again. She already owns two pairs. Kellie owns six.

That’s not hype. That’s lived loyalty. And a brilliant pant.

And yet - I stopped production.

Early Decemeber, I commissioned a 'Fabric Propensity to Surface Pilling, Fuzzing or Matting As Received (ISO 12945-1:2020, Pilling Box Method)' test. 4 hours of mechanical rubbing. It passed, a purchase order was raised and I was invoiced many thousands of dollars, due Jan 1 2026. 'Maria' could be expected March/April.

Yay, I thought.

The lie we’ve all been sold

Between Dec 11 and 31 of casual wearing this design (finally a reason to appreciate a cold Hobart summer!), the fabric pilled through the thighs and frayed inside the hem. Not mistreatment. Not extremme sport behaviour. Just being worn. By a tall woman. Living her life.

I’m not mildly annoyed. I'm disappointed-but-polite angry.

Because I was then told that a fabric failing in real life is “within scope.”

I'm angry, because I was told to accept it as “commercially acceptable”…"This is quite normal performance".

That sentence is the problem.

So I cancelled our order of over 300 pants, asked my pattern set be return to me, and in quiet rebellion while nodding to the quality standard previously set - wore my Maria Athleisure pants from 2004 out to bring in the new year.

Why clothes cost more - and why they still fall apart

People complain about the price of clothing. I get it. I feel it too.

But here’s the truth the industry doesn’t say out loud:

Clothes are expensive because the quality is rubbish - not because it’s good.

We’re paying more for:

• weaker fibres

• cheaper yarns

• finishes that photograph beautifully and fail quietly

• “passes” that only pass if nobody actually wears the garment properly

Mass market has normalised this so thoroughly that failure has been reframed as acceptable.

Not here.

The reframe no one gives you

“Within scope” ≠ acceptable for Miss G & Me

Yes - for many brands:

• Thigh pilling after a few weeks? Shrug.

• Hem abrasion from contact? Meh.

• “It’s expected wear”? Apparently fine.

That logic only works if your brand is:

• disposable

• trend-driven

• built on the assumption that the garment won’t be loved for long

Miss G & Me is none of those things.

I design for:

• height

• movement

• bodies that experience friction when you walk

• women who wear their clothes often and expect them to keep up

That changes the bar. Entirely.

Why the lab pass didn’t bring back Maria (and why this matters)

Here’s the uncomfortable truth, ISO standards and lab pilling tests are:

• controlled

• averaged

• short-term

They don’t capture:

• sustained thigh-on-thigh friction

• longer inseams increasing contact time

• hems brushing boots, floors, stairs (tall life again)

So yes - a fabric can score a 4 in the lab and still perform like a 2 in real wear for tall women in fitted pants.

Maria - 2024. Sold out in 6 weeks.

Stopping production wasn’t failure. It was leadership.

Here’s what actually happened:

• I protected future customers - including the ones already asking for more - keep asking Fiona, it will happen!

• I protected the trust 'Maria' earned in 2024

• I protected the brand promise of beautiful clothes for the tall

• I took a financial hit now instead of a costly reputational one later

That’s quiet, expensive, leadership.

The kind that happens behind the scenes.The kind customers never see - but always feel.

An because there will be no 'Maria' to launch to you in May, is why I'm sharing this with you now.

The rule this experience locked in

If you take one thing from this, take this:

Any fabric used in any Miss G & Me garments must pass weeks of real wear without visible pilling or abrasion. Lab results alone are not sufficient.

That declaration will save the brand. And it will save emotional energy - which matters more than people admit.

Not the cheapest. Not the easiest. The right thing.

This is why some garments cost more. Not because they’re fancy. But because someone, possibly me, somewhere, said no - even when it hurt.

Even when the style was loved. Even when customers were waiting.

Tall women deserve clothes that live up to their loyalty.

I’m not interested in “within scope”if the scope is broken.

X Penni

Comments for this post have been turned off, please join the conversation in our private group

TALL AUSTRALIAN WOMEN